Men’s Olympic Ice Hockey Point Table Explained – Complete Group A, B & C Standings Analysis
The Men’s Olympic Ice Hockey standings at the Winter Olympics 2026 are divided into three groups — A, B, and C. Each team plays three group-stage matches (GP = Games Played). Teams earn points based on match results, and rankings are determined primarily by total points (PTS), followed by goal difference (GD), goals for (GF), and other tie-breakers if needed.
| Team | GP | W | OTW | OTL | L | PTS | GF | GA | GD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Canada | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 3 | +17 |
 Switzerland | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 8 | +1 |
 Czechia | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 |
 France | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 20 | -15 |
| Team | GP | W | OTW | OTL | L | PTS | GF | GA | GD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Slovakia | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 8 | +2 |
 Finland | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 5 | +11 |
 Sweden | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 9 | +2 |
 Italy | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 19 | -15 |
| Team | GP | W | OTW | OTL | L | PTS | GF | GA | GD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 16 | 5 | +11 |
 Germany | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 |
 Denmark | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 |
 Latvia | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 |
How the Points System Works
- W (Win in regulation) – 3 points
- OTW (Overtime win) – 2 points
- OTL (Overtime loss) – 1 point
- L (Loss in regulation) – 0 points
This system rewards teams that win in regular time while still giving one point to teams that push games into overtime.
Group A Analysis
Group A is dominated by Canada, who won all three matches in regulation. They collected the maximum 9 points with an impressive goal difference of +17 (20 goals scored, only 3 conceded). This shows both offensive strength and defensive stability.
Switzerland finished second with 5 points, thanks to one regulation win and one overtime win. Their +1 goal difference indicates closely contested matches.
Czechia secured 4 points with one regulation win and one overtime loss. Despite scoring 9 goals, they conceded 12, giving them a negative goal difference.
France struggled significantly, losing all three games in regulation and finishing with 0 points and a -15 goal difference.
Group B Analysis
Group B is extremely competitive, with three teams tied at 6 points each.
Slovakia, Finland, and Sweden all won two matches and lost one. Since all three teams have equal points, goal difference becomes crucial.
Finland stands out with a +11 goal difference (16 scored, 5 conceded), indicating dominant victories. Slovakia and Sweden both have +2, but further tie-breakers such as head-to-head results may determine final rankings.
Italy finished last in Group B with three losses and 0 points, conceding 19 goals.
Group C Analysis
Group C is led convincingly by United States, who secured three regulation wins for a perfect 9 points and a +11 goal difference. Their balanced attack and defense make them strong contenders for the knockout stage.
Germany, Denmark, and Latvia all finished with 3 points (one win and two losses each). With identical points, rankings depend heavily on goal difference. Germany and Denmark share -3, while Latvia sits at -5.
What These Standings Mean
- The top team in each group usually advances directly to the quarterfinals.
- Second- and third-placed teams may enter qualification playoffs depending on the Olympic format.
- Goal difference is critical when teams are tied on points.
- Offensive power (GF) and defensive discipline (GA) often decide advancement.
In summary, Canada and the United States look dominant after the group stage, while Group B remains tightly contested. The knockout rounds will likely feature intense matchups as teams fight for Olympic gold.
By
By
